CommLaw Monitor https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/commlaw-monitor News and analysis from Kelley Drye’s communications practice group Sat, 29 Jun 2024 17:31:59 -0400 60 hourly 1 Broad Coalition Seeks Rulemaking for MPLS-Based Services https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/commlaw-monitor/broad-coalition-seeks-rulemaking-for-mpls-based-services https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/commlaw-monitor/broad-coalition-seeks-rulemaking-for-mpls-based-services Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:53:45 -0400 A broad coalition of telecommunications carriers is asking the FCC to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to determine the proper treatment of MPLS-based services for regulatory and Universal Service purposes. The coalition, which includes Verizon, XO, Level 3, Qwest and four other carriers, are providers of services based on the Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) technology. The carriers recently met with advisors to the FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau and urged the FCC to clarify prospectively the proper treatment of services based on this technology.

MPLS is a technology that enables Internet protocol networks to make routing decisions based on user-assigned labels. MPLS is employed in many advanced data networks in order to provide users with highly-flexible, secure "virtual" networks. Unfortunately, several controversies have developed over whether an MPLS-based service is a regulated "telecommunications service" or an unregulated "information service."

The coalition carriers acknowledge this issue, and urge the FCC to initiate a rulemaking to address the proper treatment going forward:

we explained that as a class of services, many MPLS-enabled services in fact have the characteristics of information services and are treated as such. Regardless, we said that to settle uncertainty the Commission should address the treatment of MPLS-enabled services in either its expected upcoming Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding universal service contributions or a different rulemaking proceeding in order to establish clear rules and expectations should the Commission decide to seek contributions on services based on MPLS. We suggested it would be appropriate for the Commission to address MPLS-enabled services going forward in order to ensure consistent prospective treatment throughout the industry.

This is not the first MPLS-related request to be submitted to the FCC. The Commission has a USF appeal that presents the issue (available in parts here: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4) and has a Petition for Clarification regarding statements it made in its FCC Form 499-A (for USF revenue reporting).

FULL DISCLOSURE: Kelley Drye represents XO Communications Services in its MPLS-related USF appeal.

]]>
April 1 USF Form Released: MPLS, Conferencing Among the Changes https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/commlaw-monitor/april-1-usf-form-released-mpls-conferencing-among-the-changes https://www.kelleydrye.com/viewpoints/blogs/commlaw-monitor/april-1-usf-form-released-mpls-conferencing-among-the-changes Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:14:03 -0500 On February 25, the FCC released the 2009 Form 499-A and instructions. All telecommunications carriers are required to report their 2008 revenues on this form to calculate universal service and other regulatory fund contribution obligations. As usual, the instructions contain a number of changes in the treatment of revenues for USF purposes, which are highlighted in a Public Notice issued by the Wireline Competition Bureau. (These changes, however are of dubious legality because they are not adopted by the FCC under notice and comment rulemaking). Most notable are the following:

  • The instructions now explicitly instruct telecommunications carriers to report revenues from MPLS-based services as telecommunications services (i.e., subject to USF). The Bureau asserts that MPLS is merely “an updated technique” and a substitute for ATM transmission.
  • The instructions add conference service providers (CSPs) to the list of entities that must file. The Bureau initially referred to conferencing services as “telecommunications services,” but quickly revised its notice to state that conferencing is merely “telecommunications.”

Telecommunications carriers must file their 499-A by April 1, 2009. April 1 also is the last day for carriers to revise their 2008 499-A (reporting 2007 revenues).

]]>